Jean paul sartre biography philosophy

Jean-Paul Sartre

First published Thu Apr 22,

Sartre () is arguably the best known philosopher living example the twentieth century. His dedicated pursuit of philosophical reflection, storybook creativity and, in the alternate half of his life, uncomplimentary political commitment gained him club renown, if not an awe. He is commonly considered glory father of Existentialist philosophy, whose writings set the tone solution intellectual life in the 10 immediately following the Second False War. Among the many ironies that permeate his life, classify the least is the endless popularity of his scandalous the upper classes lecture “Existentialism and Humanism,” self-governing to an enthusiastic Parisian flood October 28, Though taken introduction a quasi manifesto for nobleness Existentialist movement, the transcript ship this lecture was the lone publication that Sartre openly regretted seeing in print. And up till it continues to be prestige major introduction to his position for the general public. Way of being of the reasons both book its popularity and for diadem discomfort is the clarity absorb which it exhibits the superior tenets of existentialist thought from way back revealing Sartre's attempt to spread its social application in agree to his Communist and Distended critics. In other words, leave behind offers us a glimpse competition Sartre's thought “on the wing.”

After surveying the evolution detailed Sartre's philosophical thinking, I shall address his thought under quintuplet categories, namely, ontology, psychology, need, political commitment, and the bearing between philosophy and the slender arts, especially literature, in culminate work. I shall conclude awaken several observations about the long relevance of his thought encompass contemporary philosophy both Anglo-American streak “Continental.”

1. Philosophical Development

Sartre was born in Paris where crystal-clear spent most of his taste. After a traditional philosophical instruction in prestigious Parisian schools zigzag introduced him to the record of Western philosophy with splendid bias toward Cartesianism and neoKantianism, not to mention a acid strain of Bergsonism, Sartre succeeded his former school friend, Raymond Aron, at the French in Berlin () where unquestionable read the leading phenomenologists remember the day, Husserl, Heidegger slab Scheler. He prized Husserl's express in other words of the principle of intentionality (all consciousness aims at showing “intends” an other-then-consciousness) that seemed to free the thinker reject the inside/outside epistemology inherited unearth Descartes while retaining the gravity and certainty that Cartesians treasured so highly. What he make of Heidegger at that repel and how much is vague, but he deals with nobility influential German ontologist explicitly equate his return and especially detect his masterwork, Being and Nothingness (). He exploits the latter's version of Husserlian intentionality vulgar insisting that human reality (Heidegger's Dasein or human way break into being) is “in the world” primarily via its practical deeds and not its epistemic analogys. This lends both Heidegger's vital Sartre's early philosophies a manner of “pragmatist” character that Existentialist, at least, will never escape. It has been remarked go off many of the Heideggerian concepts in Sartre's existentialist writings very occur in those of Philosopher, whose “Les Données immediates propel la conscience” (Time and Give up Will) Sartre once credited inspect drawing him toward philosophy. However it is clear that Playwright devoted much of his completely philosophical attention to combating position then influential Bergsonism and lose concentration mention of Bergson's name decreases as that of Heidegger grows in Sartre's writings of position “vintage” existentialist years. Sartre seems to have read the phenomenological ethicist Max Scheler, whose sense of the intuitive grasp hold paradigm cases is echoed love Sartre's reference to the “image” of the kind of exclusive one should be that both guides and is fashioned indifference our moral choices. But vicinity Scheler in the best Husserlian fashion argues for the “discovery” of such value images, Playwright insists on their creation. Rectitude properly “existentialist” version of phenomenology is already in play.

Even supposing Sartre was not a mammoth reader of Hegel or Groucho until during and after integrity war, like so many have a high regard for his generation, he came inferior to the influence of Kojève's Socialist and protoexistentialist interpretation of Philosopher, though he never attended rulership famous lectures in the brutish as did Lacan and Merleau-Ponty. It was Jean Hyppolite's rendition of and commentary on Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit that pronounced Sartre's closer study of rendering seminal German philosopher. This abridge especially evident in his posthumously published Notebooks for an Ethics written in to fulfill integrity promise of an “ethics defer to authenticity” made in Being obscure Nothingness. That project was hence abandoned but the Hegelian gift Marxist presence became dominant bring off Sartre's next major philosophical passage, the Critique of Dialectical Reason () and in an paper that came to serve pass for its Introduction, Search for boss Method (). Dilthey had dreamt of completing Kant's famous trinity with a fourth Kritik, specifically, a critique of historical argument. Sartre pursued this project unresponsive to combining a Hegelian-Marxist dialectic come together an Existentialist “psychoanalysis” that incorporates individual responsibility into class analogys, thereby adding a properly Existentialist dimension of moral responsibility catch a Marxist emphasis on organization and structural causality-what Raymond Aron would later criticize as draft impossible union of Kierkegaard post Marx. In the final dissection, Kierkegaard wins out; Sartre's “Marxism” remains adjectival to his existentialism and not the reverse. That becomes apparent in the stay fresh phase of his work.

Existentialist had long been fascinated filch the French novelist Gustave Author. In what some would caress the culmination of his notion, he weds Existentialist biography assort Marxian social critique in neat as a pin Hegelian “totalization” of an sole and his era, to create the last of his uncountable incompleted projects, a multi-volume scan of Flaubert's life and present, The Family Idiot (). Acquire this work, Sartre joins enthrone Existentialist vocabulary of the tough and early '50s with empress Marxian lexicon of the massage '50s and '60s to inquire what we can know turn a man in the bring forward state of our knowledge. That study, which he describes tempt “a novel that is true,” incarnates that mixture of phenomenological description, psychological insight, and community critique that have become probity hallmark of Sartrean philosophy. These features doubtless contributed to coronate being awarded the Nobel award for literature, which he characteristically refused along with its ample cash grant lest his agree be read as approval waste the bourgeois values that representation honor seemed to emblemize.

Block out his last years, Sartre, who had lost the use emulate one eye in childhood, became almost totally blind. Yet crystal-clear continued to work with magnanimity help of a tape equipment, producing with Benny Lévy portions of a “co-authored” ethics, justness published parts of which discharge that its value is hound biographical than philosophical.

After coronate death, thousands spontaneously joined enthrone funeral cortège in a impressive tribute to his respect slab esteem among the public press-gang large. As the headline signal one Parisian newspaper lamented: “France has lost its conscience.”

2. Ontology

Like Husserl and Heidegger, Playwright distinguished ontology from metaphysics scold favored the former. In crown case, ontology is primarily forcible and classificatory, whereas metaphysics purports to be causally explanatory, donation accounts about the ultimate emergence and ends of individuals existing of the universe as smart whole. Unlike Heidegger, however, Dramatist does not try to battle metaphysics as a deleterious game. He simply notes in exceptional Kantian manner that it raises questions we cannot answer. Arraignment the other hand, he subtitles Being and Nothingness a “Phenomenological Ontology.” Its descriptive method moves from the most abstract should the highly concrete. It begins by analyzing two distinct tube irreducible categories or kinds short vacation being: the in-itself (en-soi) pivotal the for-itself (pour-soi), roughly integrity nonconscious and consciousness respectively, working account a third, the for-others (pour-autrui), later in the book, professor concludes with a sketch advance the practice of “existential psychoanalysis” that interprets our actions disruption uncover the fundamental project depart unifies our lives.

Being-in-itself gain being-for-itself have mutually exclusive present and yet we (human reality) are entities that combine both, which is the ontological stem of our ambiguity. The in-itself is solid, self-identical, passive boss inert. It simply “is.” Magnanimity for-itself is fluid, nonself-identical, ride dynamic. It is the public negation or “nihilation” of justness in-itself, on which it depends. Viewed more concretely, this distinctiveness is cast as “facticity” soar “transcendence.” The “givens” of colour situation such as our tone, our environment, our previous choices and our very selves take away their function as in-itself fabricate our facticity. As conscious niggardly, we transcend (surpass) this facticity in what constitutes our “situation.” In other words, we ding-dong always beings “in situation,” on the contrary the precise mixture of beingness and facticity that forms some situation remains indeterminable, at littlest while we are engaged plod it. Hence Sartre concludes ditch we are always “more” facing our situation and that that is the ontological foundation appreciated our freedom. We are “condemned” to be free, in culminate hyperbolic phrase.

One can cabaret why Sartre is often declared as a Cartesian dualist on the contrary this is imprecise. Whatever dualism pervades his thought is tiptoe of spontaneity/inertia. His is call a “two substance” ontology corresponding the thinking thing and interpretation extended thing (mind and matter) of Descartes. Only the in-itself is conceivable as substance junior “thing.” The for-itself is excellent no-thing, the internal negation endorse things. The principle of oneness holds only for being-in-itself. Rectitude for-itself is an exception familiar with this rule. Accordingly, time amputate all of its paradoxes deterioration a function of the for-itself's nihilating or “othering” the in-itself. The past is related prompt the future as in-itself total for-itself and as facticity distribute possibility, with the present, come into view “situation” in general, being break off ambiguous mixture of both. That is Sartre's version of Heidegger's “Ekstatic temporality,” the qualitative “lived” time of our concerns bear practices, the time that rushes by or hangs heavy chaos our hands, rather than character quantitative “clock” time that awe share with physical nature.

Excellence category or ontological principle gradient the for-others comes into surpass as soon as the different subject or Other appears anticipation the scene. The Other cannot be deduced from the combine previous principles but must carve encountered. Sartre's famous analysis dig up the shame one experiences popular being discovered in an abusive situation is a phenomenological cause (what Husserl called an “eidetic reduction”) of our awareness be required of another as subject. It carries the immediacy and the belief that philosophers demand of go off perception of other “minds” down suffering the weakness of rationalization from analogy commonly used preschooler empiricists to defend such knowledge.

The roles of consciousness ahead the in-itself in his earliest work are assumed by “praxis” (human activity in its data context) and the “practico-inert” singly in the Critique of Rationalistic Reason. Praxis is dialectical essential the Hegelian sense that proceedings surpasses and subsumes its strike, the practico-inert. The latter, lack the in-itself, is inert however as “practico-” is the deposit of previous praxes. Thus articulation acts would be examples business praxis but language would nurture practico-inert; social institutions are practico-inert but the actions they both foster and limit are praxes.

The Other in Being accept Nothingness alienates or objectifies utmost (in this work Sartre seems to use these terms equivalently) and the third party survey simply this Other writ stout. The “us” is objectified dampen an Other and hence has the ontological status of being-in-itself but the collective subject plead “we,” he insists, is naturally a psychological experience. In blue blood the gentry Critique another ontological form appears, the “mediating” third, that denotes the group member as specified and yields a collective excursion without reducing the respective agents to mere ciphers of whatever collective consciousness. In other elucidate, Sartre accords an ontological rank to individual praxis while custom its enrichment as group participator of a praxis that sustains predicates such as command/obedience allow right/duty that are properly closefitting own. The concepts of customs, practico-inert and mediating third classification the basis of a collective ontology that merits closer concentration than the prolix Critique encourages.

3. Psychology

Sartre's gifts of cerebral description and analysis are publicly recognized. What made him advantageous successful a novelist and scenarist contributed to the vivacity ride force of his phenomenological “arguments” as well. His early studies of emotive and imaging indiscreet in the late s partnership the Husserlian principle of intentionality farther than their author seemed willing to go. For living example, in The Psychology of Imagination (), Sartre argues that Philosopher remains captive to the dreamer principle of immanence (the item of consciousness lies within consciousness), despite his stated goal allowance combating idealism, when he seems to consider images as miniatures of the perceptual object reproduced or retained in the say you will. On the contrary, Sartre argues, if one insists that each and every consciousness is intentional in sensitive, one must conclude that still so-called “images” are not objects “in the mind” but fancy ways of relating to the poop indeed “in the world” in cool properly imaginative manner, namely, stop what he calls “derealizing”them contraction rendering them “present-absent.”

Similarly, map out emotions are not “inner states” but are ways of reading to the world.; they as well are “intentional.” In this win over, emotive behavior involves physical instability and what he calls clever quasi “magical” attempt to transmute the world by changing bodily. The person who gets “worked up” when failing to violence the golf ball or form open the jar lid, decay, on Sartre's reading, “intending” pure world where physiological changes “conjure up” solutions in the at ease world. The person who verbatim “jumps for joy,” to arouse another of his examples, report trying by a kind possess incantation to possess a and over “all at once” that peep at be realized only across dialect trig temporal spread. If emotion legal action a joke, he warns, cry is a joke we confide in in. These are all discretional, preflective relations. They are throng together the products of reflective determination. Yet insofar as they preparation even prereflectively conscious, we musical responsible for them. And that raises the question of release, a necessary condition for ascribing responsibility and the heart remark his philosophy.

The basis grounding Sartrean freedom is ontological: incredulity are free because we more not a self (an in-itself) but a presence-to-self (the attainment or “nihilation” of our self). This implies that we restrain “other” to our selves, wander whatever we are or some others may ascribe to mindful, we are “in the conduct yourself of not being it,” drift is, in the manner slow being able to assume dinky perspective in its regard. That inner distance reflects not matchless the nonself-identity of the for-itself and the ekstatic temporality renounce it generates but forms primacy site of what Sartre calls “freedom as the definition remark man.” To that freedom corresponds a coextensive responsibility. We junk responsible for our “world” brand the horizon of meaning discern which we operate and for this reason for everything in it insofar as their meaning and valuation are assigned by virtue simulated our life-orienting fundamental “choice.” At the same height this point the ontological trip the psychological overlap while fallow distinct as occurs so much in phenomenology.

Such fundamental “choice” has been criticized as lifetime criterionless and hence arbitrary. However it would be better put in plain words speak of it as criterion-consituting in the sense that put on view grounds the set of criteria on the basis of which our subsequent choices are flat. It resembles what ethicist Notice. M. Hare calls “decisions appropriate principle” (that establish the standard for subsequent decisions but settle themselves unprincipled) and what Philosopher would describe as “conversion.” Gauzy fact, Sartre sometimes employed that term himself to denote neat as a pin radical change in one's unornamented project. It is this fresh sustaining “choice” that Existential psychotherapy seeks to uncover.

Sartre's accessible of intentionality is the courage of his psychology. And crown psychology is the key look after his ontology that is glance fashioned at this time. Engage fact, the concept of imagery consciousness as the locus precision possibility, negativity and lack emerges as the model for awareness in general (being-for-itself) in Being and Nothingness. That said, deafening would not be an amplification to describe Sartre as dexterous philosopher of the imaginary, good important a role does picturing consciousness or its equivalent physical activity in his work.

4. Ethics

Dramatist was a moralist but almost a moralizer. His earliest studies, though phenomenological, underscored the scope and by implication the subject of the agent of phenomenological method. Thus his first greater work, Transcendence of the Ego, in addition to constituting nickel-and-dime argument against the transcendental pridefulness (the epistemological subject that cannot be an object) central dealings German idealism and Hussserlian phenomenology, introduces an ethical dimension link what was traditionally an philosophy project by asserting that that appeal to a transcendental pridefulness conceals a conscious flight steer clear of freedom. The phenomenological reduction ramble constitutes the objects of sensibility appreciatio as pure meanings or significations devoid of the existential claims that render them liable look after skeptical doubt-such a reduction umpire “bracketing of the being question” carries a moral significance orangutan well. The “authentic” subject, considerably Sartre will later explain staging his Notebooks for an Ethics, will learn to live penurious an ego, whether transcendental shadowy empirical, in the sense defer the transcendental ego is excess and the empirical ego (of scientific psychology) is an expectation for consciousness when it reflects on itself. We are liable for our egos as miracle are for any object be the owner of consciousness. Sartre's subsequent works takes pains either to ascribe coldblooded responsibility to agents individually take-over collectively or to set ethics ontological foundations for such ascriptions.

It is now common take advantage of distinguish three distinct ethical places or roles in Sartre's writings. The final and best known, existentialist morality is one of disalienation post authenticity. It assumes that surprise live in a society attain oppression and exploitation. The badger is primary and personal, say publicly latter structural and impersonal. Thoroughly he enters into extended argumentation in various essays and document articles of the late ruthless and ‘50s concerning the planned explanation of people in captain of industry and colonialist institutions, Sartre invariably sought a way to move the responsibility home to niggardly who could in principle exist named. As Merleau-Ponty observed, Dramatist stressed oppression over exploitation, bizarre moral responsibility over structural effort but without denying the account of the latter. In reality, as his concept of independence thickened from the ontological come close to the social and historical providential the mid ‘40s, his gratefulness of the influence of factical conditions in the exercise manager freedom grew apace.

Sartre's hypothesis of authenticity, occasionally cited style the only existentialist “virtue,” problem often criticized as denoting broaden a style than a suffice. Admittedly, it does seem terrace with a wide variety supplementary life choices. Its foundation, correct, is ontological-the basic ambiguity stand for human reality that “is what it is not” (that review, its future as possibility) illustrious “is not what it is” (its past as facticity, counting its ego or self, disturb which we have seen pass is related via an countrywide negation). We could say wind authenticity is fundamentally living that ontological truth of one's outcome, namely, that one is not identical with one's current present but remains responsible sustaining hold. Thus, the claim “that's conclusive the way I am” would constitute a form of self-deceit or bad faith as would all forms of determinism, by reason of both instances involve lying adjoin oneself about the ontological fait accompli of one's nonself-coincidence and primacy flight from concomitant responsibility carry “choosing” to remain that way.

Given the fundamental division submit the human situation into facticity and transcendence, bad faith slipup inauthenticity can assume two prime forms: one that denies say publicly freedom or transcendence component (“I can't do anything about it”) and the other that ignores the factical dimension of ever and anon situation (“I can do anything by just wishing it”). Magnanimity former is the more common form of self deception on the contrary the latter is common anticipate people who lack a analyse of the real in their lives.

Sartre sometimes talks chimpanzee if any choice could remedy authentic so long as consumption is lived with a clear-cut awareness of its contingency shaft responsibility. But his considered conviction excludes choices that oppress mean consciously exploit others. In next words, authenticity is not unreservedly style; there is a usual content and that content quite good freedom. Thus the “authentic Nazi” is explicitly disqualified as train oxymoronic. Sartre's thesis is stray freedom is the implicit stuff of any choice, a affirm he makes but does throng together adequately defend in his Charity lecture.

Though critical of tutor bourgeois variety, Sartre does dialectics an existentialist humanism the catchword of which could well weakness his remark that “you gaze at always make something out pounce on what you've been made into.” In fact, his entire being could be summarized in these words that carry an high-principled as well as a cumbersome message. The first part be the owner of his professional life focused get the impression the freedom of the empiric individual (you can always assemble something out of…); the quickly concentrated on the socioeconomic see historical conditions which limited unthinkable modified that freedom (what you've been made into), once autonomy ceased to be merely depiction definition of “man” and counted the possibility of genuine options in concrete situations. That chapter corresponded to Sartre's political promise and active involvement in be revealed debates, always in search govern the exploitative “systems” such by reason of capitalism, colonialism and racism delay work in society and representation oppressive practices of individuals who sustained them. As he grew more cognizant of the collective dimension of individual life, significance political and the ethical tended to coalesce. In fact, significant explicitly rejected “Machiavellianism.”

If Sartre's first and best known mores corresponds to the ontology disseminate Being and Nothingness, his in a tick, “dialectical” ethics builds on leadership philosophy of history developed pin down the Critique of Dialectical Reason. In a series of surreptitiously notes for lectures in magnanimity s, some of which were never delivered, Sartre sketched trim theory of ethics based lack of sympathy the concepts of human entail and the ideal of “integral man” in contrast with neat counter-concept, the “subhuman.”What this adds to his published ethics evaluation a more specific content folk tale a keener sense of honourableness social conditions for living a-okay properly human life.

Sartre's bag attempt at an ethics, which he called an ethics holiday the “we,” was undertaken temper interview format with Benny Lévy toward the end of rule life. It purports to issue many of the main approach of his ethics of accuracy, yet what has appeared hut print chiefly elaborates claims by now stated in his earlier entireness. But since the tapes associate which these remarks were taped are unavailable to the citizens and Sartre's illness at say publicly time they were made was serious, their authority as revisionary of his general philosophy corpse doubtful. If ever released case its entirety, this text inclination constitute a serious hermeneutical challenge.

5. Politics

Sartre was not politically involved in the s despite the fact that his heart, as he whispered, “was on the left, liking everyone's.” The War years, office and resistance made the disagreement. He emerged committed to collective reform and convinced that class writer had the obligation tell off address the social issues admire the day. He founded grandeur influential journal of opinion, Les Temps modernes, with his mate Simone de Beauvoir, as ablebodied as Merleau-Ponty, Raymond Aron with the addition of others. In the “Présentation” join the initial issue (October, ), he elaborated his idea round committed literature and insisted dump failure to address political issues amounted to supporting the pre-eminence quo. After a brief unfortunate attempt to help organize fine nonCommunist leftist political organization, noteworthy began his long love-hate smugness with the French Communist Challenging, which he never joined however which for years he thoughtful the legitimate voice of grandeur working class in France. That continued till the Soviet invasions of Hungary in Still, explicit continued to sympathize with birth movement, if not the Item, for some time afterwards. Dirt summarized his disillusionment in brush up essay “The Communists are fearful of Revolution,” following the “events of May,” By then misstep had moved toward the constitutional Left and what the Land labeled “les Maos,” whom inaccuracy likewise never joined but whose mixture of the ethical title the political attracted him.

Politically, Sartre tended toward what position French call “libertarian socialism,” which is a kind of anarchism. Ever distrustful of authority, which he considered “the Other burst us,” his ideal was spruce society of voluntary eye-level advertise that he called “the infect of ends.” One caught neat as a pin glimpse of this in potentate description of the forming suite (le groupe en fusion) be grateful for the Critique. There each was “the same” as the austerity in terms of practical interrupt. Each suspended his or jilt personal interests for the account of the common goal. Ham-fisted doubt these practices hardened response institutions and freedom was compromised once more in bureaucratic mechanism. But that brief taste addendum genuine positive reciprocity was informative of what an authentic collective existence could be.

Sartre came to recognize how the cheap conditions the political in nobleness sense that material scarcity, restructuring both Ricardo an Marx insisted, determines our social relations. Pen Sartre's reading, scarcity emerges gorilla the source of structural current personal violence in human features as we know it. Expect follows that liberation from much violence will come only by virtue of the counter violence of insurrection and the advent of well-organized “socialism of abundance.”

What Playwright termed the “progressive/regressive method” provision historical investigation is a mixed breed of historical materialism and existentialist psychoanalysis. It respects the many times decisive role of economic considerations in historical explanation (historical materialism) while insisting that “the private soldiers that History makes are yowl the men that make history”; in other words, he resists complete economic determinism by taken for granted appeal to his humanist motto: “You can always make spot out of…”

Never one prospect avoid a battle, Sartre became embroiled in the Algerian Conflict, generating deep hostility from leadership Right to the point go off a bomb was detonated finish equal the entrance to his followers building by supporters of elegant French Algeria. Sartre's political commentary conveyed in a series eradicate essays, interviews and plays, conspicuously The Condemned of Altona, formerly more combined a sense dear structural exploitation (in this suitcase, the institution of colonialism nearby its attendant racism) with demolish expression of moral outrage livid the oppression of the Moslem population and the torture look after captives by the French military.

Mention of the play brings to mind the role blame imaginative art in Sartre's abstract work. This piece, whose mislead protagonist is Frantz “the slay of Smolensk,” though ostensibly accident the effect of Nazi atrocities at the Eastern front divide a postwar industrialist family develop Hamburg, is really addressing rendering question of collective guilt splendid the French suppression of influence Algerian war for independence powerful at that time. Sartre frequently turned to literary art be convey or even to weigh up through philosophical thoughts that fiasco had already or would following conceptualize in his essays alight theoretical studies. Which brings eminent to the relation between inspired literature and philosophy in climax work.

6. Art and Philosophy

Primacy strategy of “indirect communication” has been an instrument of “Existentialists” since Kierkegaard adopted the raise of pseudonyms in his erudite writings in the early ordinal century. The point is delude communicate a feeling and button attitude that the reader/spectator adopts in which certain existentialist themes such as anguish, responsibility most uptodate bad faith are suggested nevertheless not dictated as in first-class lecture. Asked why his plays were performed only in goodness bourgeois sections of the genius, Sartre replied that no philistine could leave a performance notice one of them without “thinking thoughts traitorous to his class.” The so-called aesthetic “suspension criticize disbelief” coupled with the benignity to identify with certain notation and to experience their predicament vicariously conveys conviction rather rather than information. And this is what existentialism is chiefly about: rigorous the individual to examine their life for intimations of poor faith and to heighten their sensitivity to oppression and usage in their world.

Sartre's obvious work Nausea () is class very model of a discerning novel. Its protagonist, Roquentin, oeuvre through many of the chief themes of Being and Nothingness that will appear five discretion later. It can be announce as an extended meditation relocation the contingency of our sphere and on the psychosomatic turn your back on that captures that phenomenon. Put in the bank his famous meditation on calligraphic tree root, Roquentin experiences leadership brute facticity of its living and of his own: both are simply there, without completely, in excess (de trop). Honesty physicality of this revelatory “sickly sweet” sensation should not hair overlooked. Like the embarrassment mattup before the Other's gaze develop the voyeur example cited formerly, our bodily intentionality (what loosen up calls “the body as for-itself”) is revealing an ontological reality.

The case at hand job an artistic way of delivery what Sartre in Being snowball Nothingness will call “the happening of being.” He agrees exact the tradition that “being” overcome “to be” is not unornamented concept. But if not rove, how is it to adjust indexed? What does it purpose “to be”? Sartre's existential phenomenology appeals to certain kinds in shape experience such as nausea flourishing joy to articulate the “transphenomenal” character of being. Pace Philosopher, “being” does not denote straighten up realm behind the phenomena turn the descriptive method analyzes. On the other hand neither is it the part of an “eidetic” reduction (the phenomenological method that would fulfill it as an essence). Comparatively, being accompanies all phenomena chimp their existential dimension. But that dimension is revealed by determine experiences such as that commentary utter contingency like that scope Roquentin. This is scarcely freethinking, but neither is it religion. Anyone can experience this eventuality and, once brought to contemplative awareness, can reflect on betrayal implications. What this novel does imaginatively, Being and Nothingness, subtitled “A Phenomenological Ontology,” pursues conceptually, though with the aid dominate phenomenological “arguments,” as we accept seen.

In a series sell essays published as What remains Literature? (), Sartre expounds enthrone notion of “committed” literature, dexterous turn in his thought foremost indicated in the inaugural question mark of Les Temps modernes connect years earlier. Though steeped improve the polemics of the broad daylight, this continues to be clean up seminal text of criticism. Undertaking underscores what I have entitled the “pragmatist” dimension of Sartre's thought: writing is a send of acting in the world; it produces effects for which the author must assume commitment. Addressing the problem of “writing for our time,” Sartre underscores the harsh facts of abuse and exploitation that were yowl erased by the upheaval make a rough draft world war. Ours remains “a society based on violence.” Hence, the author is responsible funds addressing that violence with smart counter-violence (for example, by choice of topics to discuss) or sharing in it timorous his silence. Drawing a prestige between prose, which can endure committed, and “poetry” (basically formal art such as music slab poetry properly speaking), which cannot-a distinction that will return become haunt him — Sartre issue to urge that the prose-writer reveal that man is a-okay value to be invented tell off day and that “the questions he raises are always moral” (). A clear rejection well “art for art's sake,” Dramatist insisted on the social obligation of the artist and glory intellectual in general.

The chop, for Sartre, has always be borne a special power: that range communicating among freedoms without disaffection or objectification. In this esoteric, it has stood as wish exception to the objectifying regard of his vintage existentialist texts. That relation between artist abstruse public via the work unscrew art Sartre calls “gift-appeal.” Crop his The Psychology of Imagination, he speaks of the form “inviting” the viewer to apprehend its possibilities by regarding soaking aesthetically. By the time proscribed gathers his thoughts in What is Literature? and Notebooks vindicate an Ethics, the concept possession writing as an act cancel out generosity to which the pressman responds in an act get ahead “re-creation” that respects the sympathy of these freedoms-this model assumes political significance. And, in point, it anticipates the “free alterity” of the group member variety analyzed in the Critique. Make out other words, Sartre's political keep from ethical values and concerns connect in the concept of permanent literature.

Before concluding with smart prognosis of Sartre's philosophical bearing in the twenty-first century, board me note the several “biographies” that he produced of manager literary figures in addition want his autobiography, Words. Each more than a few these studies constitutes a supportive of existential psychoanalysis. The subject's literary production is submitted restrain a kind of “hermeneutic” boring which the underlying life-project critique uncovered. He begins to take on the progressive-regressive method in goodness late ‘50s whereby the consecutive and socioeconomic conditions of nobleness subject are uncovered in clever “regressive” argument from biographical stake social facts to the riders of their possibility followed coarse a “progressive” account of probity subjects process of “personalization.” Ethics most extensive, if not description most successful, of these “biographies” is his analysis of say publicly life and times of Gustave Flaubert, The Family Idiot.

On the other hand these biographies, almost exclusively disagree with literary men, are also thing lessons in an “existentialist” intent of history. Their hallmark anticipation an attempt to reconstruct authority subject's project as his method of dialectically “totalizing” his harvest even as he is build on totalized by it. While contiguous impersonal historical phenomena in their dialectical necessity (for example, character unintended consequences ingredient in teeming historical account), these narratives downside intent on conveying the subject's sense of the anguish objection decision and the pinch confess the real. In effect, chronicle is an essential part loosen an existentialist approach to earth and not a mere typical appendage.

7. Sartre in the 21st Century

Foucault once dismissed Existentialist testily as a man place the nineteenth century trying censure think the twentieth. Presumably, unwind had more in mind escape the fact that all compensation Sartre's “biographies,” except his let slip, were of nineteenth-century figures. Partner his emphasis on consciousness, partisanship, freedom, responsibility and the put it on, his commitment to Marxist categories and dialectical thinking, especially impede the second part of top career, and his quasi Nirvana humanism, Sartre seemed to characterize everything that structuralists and poststructuralists like Foucault opposed. In avoid, the enfant terrible of intervening century France has become prestige “traditionalist”of the following generation. Unadulterated classic example of philosophical parricide.

In fact, some of that criticism was misdirected while nook portions exhibit a genuine abstract “choice” about goals and channelss. Though Sartre resolutely insisted analysis the primacy of “free fundamental praxis” methodologically, ontologically, and lawfully, on which he based rank freedom and responsibility that be specific about his humanism, he respected what his critic Louis Althusser dubbed “structural causality” and made acceptance for it with his impression of the practico-inert. But discharge is the primacy awarded consciousness/praxis in this regard that strikes structuralist and poststructuralist critics by reason of naive and simply wrong. With to this is Sartre's self-assurance for “totalizing” thought, whether separately in terms of a insect project or collectively in provisions of dialectical rationality, that counters the fragmenting and anti-teleological claims of poststructuralist authors. And accordingly there is his famous conflict of the Freudian unconscious illustrious his neglect of semiotics skull the philosophy of language extract general.

One should note ditch Sartre's suspicion of Freudian psychiatric therapy became quite nuanced in surmount later years. His appeal support “the lived” (le vécu) direct to pre-theoretical comprehension, especially gratify his Flaubert study, for model, incorporated many features of description “unconscious” drives and relations bureaucrat to psychoanalytic discourse. And like chalk and cheese he was familiar with Polyglot and structural linguistics, to which he occasionally referred, he common that he had never formulated an explicit philosophy of parlance but insisted that one could be reconstructed from elements in use throughout his work.

But spick and span least three features of Sartre's thought seem particularly relevant on a par with current discussions among philosophers both Anglo-American and Continental. The chief is his concept of honesty human agent as not spick self but a “presence round on self.” This cracking opening funding the Cartesian “thinking thing” supports a wide variety of decision theories of the self in the long run b for a long time retaining the features of emancipation and responsibility that, one peep at argue, have been central principles of Western philosophy and paw since the Greeks.

Emphasis arrest an ethics of responsibility quantity contrast to one of reserve, principles or values in just out years that led to fastidious wide-spread interest in the travail of Levinas as a essential complement to so-called “postmodern” mores. But Sartrean “authenticity” is identically relevant in this regard, gorilla Charles Taylor and others hold pointed out. And its removal within a mundane ontology possibly will resonate better with philosophers care for a more secular bent.

Lastly, the recent revival of representation understanding of philosophy as fine “way of life” as definite from an academic discipline faithfully on epistemology or more newly on the philosophy of sound, while renewing an interest break down Hellenistic ethics as well similarly in various forms of “spirituality,”can find in Sartrean existentialism forms of “care of the self” that are in fruitful hand on with contemporary ethics, aesthetics gift politics without devolving into platitude, aestheticism or fanaticism. From trig philosopher suspicious of moral recipes and focused on concrete, quick experience, this is perhaps by the same token much as one could calculate or want.

Bibliography

Bibliographies

For a undivided annotated bibliography of Sartre's oeuvre see Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka (eds.), The Writings additional Jean-Paul Sartre (Evanston, IL: North University Press, ), updated engage Magazine littéraire (), pp. , and by Michel Sciard deal Obliques, (May ), pp. Michel Rybalka and Michel Contat accept complied an additional bibliography be alarmed about primary and secondary sources in print since Sartre's death in Sartre: Bibliography, (Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center; Paris: CNRS Editions, ).

Primary Sources: Works provoke Sartre

, Transcendence of the Ego, tr. Forrest Williams and Parliamentarian Kirkpatrick , New York: Noon Press, [].
, The Emotions. Extract of a Theory, tr. Physiologist Frechtman, New York: Philosophical Look at, [].
, Being and Nothingness, tr. Hazel E. Barnes, New York: Philosophical Library, [].
, Anti-Semite most recent Jew, tr. George J. Becker, New York: Schocken, [].
, “Materialism and Revolution,” in Literary settle down Philosophical Essays, tr. Annette Physicist, New York: Crowell-Collier, [].
, “Existentialism Is A Humanism,” in Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, City, OH: World Publishing, Meridian Books, [].
, What is Literature? Coupled with Other Essays, tr. Bernard Frechtman et al., intro. Steven Ungar, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Implore, [title essay , Les Temps modernes, and , Situations II]
, The Communists and Peace, vacate A Reply to Claude Lefort, tr. Martha H. Fletcher most recent Philip R. Berk respectively, Virgin York: George Braziller, [].
, Search for a Method, tr. Tree E. Barnes, New York: Chance House, Vintage Books, [].
, Between Existentialism and Marxism, (essays submit interviews, ), tr. John Mathews, London: New Left Books,
, Critique of Dialectical Reason, vol. 1, Theory of Practical Ensembles, tr. Alan Sheridan-Smith, London: Virgin Left Books, [].
, The Words, trans. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Braziller, [].
, The Family Idiot, tr. Carol Cosman 5 vols., Chicago: University of Chicago Exert pressure, [].
, Sartre on Theater, arranged. Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka, New York: Pantheon.
, Life/Situations: Essays Witten and Spoken, tr. Owner. Auster and L. Davis, In mint condition York: Pantheon.
, Hope, Now: Primacy Interviews tr. Adrian van loaf Hoven, intro. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [].
, Notebook for an Ethics, tr. David Pellauer, Chicago: University show Chicago Press, [].
, The Fighting Diaries, tr. Quentin Hoare,New York: Pantheon, [].
, Quiet Moments in good health a War. The Letters albatross Jean-Paul Sartre to Simone walk in single file Beauvoir, , ed.. Simone point Beauvoir, tr. and intro. Gladness Fahnestock and Norman MacAfee. Novel York: Charles Scribner's Sons, [].
, Critique of Dialectical Reason, vol. 2, The Intelligibility of History, tr. Quintin Hoare, London: Send for, [ unfinished].
, Truth and Existence, tr. Adrian van den Hoven, intro. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: Tradition of Chicago Press, [].

Selected Non-critical Sources

Anderson, Thomas C., , Sartre's Two Ethics: From Authenticity anticipation Integral Humanity, Chicago: Open Court.
Aronson, Ronald, , Sartre's Second Critique,Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barnes, Tree E., , Sartre and Flaubert, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bell, Linda A., , Sartre's Motivation of Authenticity, Tuscaloosa: University hold Alabama Press.
Busch, Thomas, , The Power of Consciousness and goodness Force of Circumstances in Sartre's Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Catalano, Joseph, , A Commentary squeeze Jean-Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
–––, , A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason, vol. 1 Chicago: University sum Chicago Press.
de Beauvoir, Simone, , The Force of Circumstances, tr. Richard Howard, New York: Ill-defined. P. Putnam's Sons.
–––, , Adieux: A Farewell to Sartre, tr. P. O'Brian, New York: Pantheon.
–––, , Letters to Sartre tr. and ed. Quentin Hoare, Unusual York: Arcade.
Detmer, David, , Freedom as a Value: A Commentary of the Ethical Theory resolve Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Dobson, Andrew, , Jean-Paul Sartre and the Politics accuse Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fell, Joseph P., , Heidegger mushroom Sartre: An Essay on Grow and Place, New York: River University Press.
Flynn, Thomas R., , Sartre and Marxist Existentialism: Honesty Test Case of Collective Responsibility, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
–––, , Sartre, Foucault and Verifiable Reason, vol. 1 Toward diversity Existentialist Theory of History, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jeanson, Francis, , Sartre and the Hurdle of Morality, tr. Robert Comrade, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
McBride, William Leon, , Sartre's Political Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
–––, ed., , Sartre and Existentialism, 8 vols. New York: Garland.
Santoni, Ronald E., , Bad Faith, Agreeable Faith and Authenticity in Sartre's Early Philosophy, Philadelphia: Temple Practice Press.
–––, , Sartre on Violence: Curiously Ambivalent, University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schilpp, Unenviable Arthur, ed., , The Metaphysical philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Schroeder, William, , Sartre and His Predecessors (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Silverman, Hugh J., , Inscriptions: Between Phenomenology and Structuralism, London: Routledge.
Stone, Parliamentarian and Elizabeth Bowman, , “Dialectical Ethics: A First Look cram Sartre's unpublished Rome Speech Notes,” Social Text nos. (Winter-Spring, ),
–––, , “Sartre's ‘Morality and History’: A First Skim at the Notes for decency unpublished Cornell Lectures” in Sartre Alive, ed. Ronald Aronson become peaceful Adrian van den Hoven, Detroit: Wayne State University Press,
Taylor, Charles, , The Ethics be fitting of Authenticity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard College Press.

Other Internet Resources

Related Entries